Distressing news. It was distressing when done in Iraq, too. I wasn't able to find any information on how the area could be decontaminated, and what that might cost.
Not being a nuclear engineer, I'm not familiar with the potential usefulness of "depleted uranium." I can only guess that using it as ammunition is the government's way of 'disposing' of nuclear waste? Can someone inform me?
It is my understanding that the UK already sent depleted uranium shells to Ukraine. There also was a huge explosion in Ukraine which may very well have destroyed those shells. So now the US is sending replacements for those shells destroyed by Russia. Will these shells meet the same fate?
Yet another sign of failure and weakness from NATOstan. The US response is always the same to any loss - escalation - there is no reverse gear. The only language NATO and the West understand is the language of force.
Is there no force on the planet that could rescue us from the diabolical cabal in DC and NATO?
Liking this doesn’t feel right at all.
Distressing news. It was distressing when done in Iraq, too. I wasn't able to find any information on how the area could be decontaminated, and what that might cost.
Not being a nuclear engineer, I'm not familiar with the potential usefulness of "depleted uranium." I can only guess that using it as ammunition is the government's way of 'disposing' of nuclear waste? Can someone inform me?
3 times harder than steel, hardest armor piercing material
Impressive characteristic.
Thank you, Lance.
It is my understanding that the UK already sent depleted uranium shells to Ukraine. There also was a huge explosion in Ukraine which may very well have destroyed those shells. So now the US is sending replacements for those shells destroyed by Russia. Will these shells meet the same fate?
Yet another sign of failure and weakness from NATOstan. The US response is always the same to any loss - escalation - there is no reverse gear. The only language NATO and the West understand is the language of force.